An analysis of the clinical chemistry test in medicine

Gustav Kirchhoff left and Robert Bunsen right Analytical chemistry has been important since the early days of chemistry, providing methods for determining which elements and chemicals are present in the object in question. During this period significant contributions to analytical chemistry include the development of systematic elemental analysis by Justus von Liebig and systematized organic analysis based on the specific reactions of functional groups.

An analysis of the clinical chemistry test in medicine

Tumor For many diseases, particularly cancer, no single biomarker test offers acceptable clinical sensitivity and specificity.

In This Issue

Often referred to as multianalyte assays with algorithmic analyses MAAAsthese tests combine results from two or more biochemical or molecular markers, along with patient demographics and clinical information, into an algorithm to generate diagnostic, prognostic, or predictive information for a disease.

In cases where single biomarker tests lack acceptable clinical sensitivity and specificity, MAAAs can improve or refine disease detection through individualized risk assessment.

MAAAs fall into two categories based on whether they use proprietary or nonproprietary algorithms. In recent years interest has grown in seeing MAAAs for various diseases developed and clinically adopted, including for cancers, acute kidney injury, sepsis, and preeclampsia. However, MAAAs have been a standard tool in obstetric care for more than 30 years to screen and to identify pregnancies that may have an increased risk of birth defects such as trisomy 21 Down syndrome and trisomy 18 Edwards syndrome.

Ovarian Cancer Women with adnexal masses suspected of ovarian malignancy benefit from referral to gynecologic oncologists for surgical intervention, as triaging to these subspecialists has been shown to improve patient outcomes.

Differentiating between benign and malignant disease and appropriately triaging women with malignant masses poses a challenge for physicians. Historically, physicians used cancer antigen CA to evaluate ovarian cancer.

Clinical Chemistry Testing

RMI incorporates CA, ultrasound features, and menopausal status for preoperative risk stratification, while the others use a combination of serum biomarkers as detailed below. In FDA cleared OVA1 to assess the probability that an adnexal mass is benign or malignant prior to a planned surgery.

Both of these tests use predefined cutoffs to categorize women into low or elevated risk of finding ovarian cancer at surgery. Fujirebio Diagnostics introduced ROMA in as a nonproprietary MAAA that uses serum concentrations of CA and HE-4 along with menopausal status to classify women with an adnexal mass as low- or high-risk of being found with an ovarian malignancy at surgery.

ROMA cutoffs for low- and high-risk stratification optimize specificity over sensitivity. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists ACOG Practice Bulletin NumberNovember outlining the clinical guidelines for evaluating and managing adnexal masses considers the use of both tests as Level B recommendations based on limited or inconsistent scientific evidence.

It recommends that clinicians refer premenopausal or postmenopausal women with an elevated OVA1 or ROMA score to a gynecologic oncologist 5. Historically, immunohistochemistry IHC testing, along with measurements such as tumor size, tumor grade, and lymph node status, was the standard in guiding breast cancer therapy.

Testing for estrogen receptor ERprogesterone receptor PRand human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 HER2 guides the use of specific targeted therapies.

An analysis of the clinical chemistry test in medicine

Several gene expression profiling tests are now available for use in patients diagnosed with breast cancer. These were designed to supplement existing techniques Table 2.

The algorithm generates a numerical value that classifies a tumor as low- intermediate- or high-riskā€”or in the case of the MammaPrint assay, patients are simply categorized as having a good- or a poor-prognosis signature. Classifications correlate with the probability of cancer recurrence within years.

Gene expression profiling testing also helps predict whether a patient will benefit from adjuvant therapy in addition to standard hormone therapy. Patients at low-risk are likely to do well with hormone therapy alone and can forgo adjuvant chemotherapy.

For example, in the Oncotype DX breast cancer test for women diagnosed with ER-positive and node-negative invasive breast cancer, results from the gene expression profile are combined into a recurrence score RS reported as a number between 0 and A low RS means a patient likely will receive minimal benefit from the addition of chemotherapy since the cancer has a lower chance of recurrence.

On the other hand, a patient with a high RS may have significant benefits from adjuvant chemotherapy since there is an increased risk of cancer recurrence. In patients with RS in the intermediate zonethe benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy have been unclear until recently.

A study of 6, women with hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative, axillary-node-negative breast cancer with RS between who were randomly assigned to two treatment groups, endocrine therapy alone or endocrine therapy plus chemotherapy, found that in patients with an intermediate RS there was no benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy as both groups had similar overall survival rates of This assay is based on a gene classifier algorithm along with clinical information about tumor size and lymph node status and is intended for use in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.

The test categorizes breast cancers into one of four molecular subtypes:EuroSciCon invites all the participants from all over the world to attend "10 th Edition of International Conference on Analytical Chemistry" during February 28 - March 01, in London, UK which includes prompt keynote presentations, Oral talks, Poster presentations and Exhibitions..

Analytical Chemistry is the science of obtaining, processing and communicating information about the. Clinical Chemistry is the leading international journal of clinical laboratory science, providing 2, pages per year of peer-reviewed papers that advance the science of the field..

Clinical Chemistry is an archival research journal that is required reading for professionals working in the following areas. Evidence-Based Laboratory Medicine and Test Utilization. Principles, characteristics and limitations of instrumentation and technologies used in a clinical chemistry laboratory, such as spectrophotometry and chromatography Interpretation of clinical findings and laboratory data, including basic TDM and toxicology.

A medical laboratory or clinical laboratory is a laboratory where tests are carried out on clinical specimens to obtain information about the health of a patient to aid in diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of disease.

Virology > Laboratory Medicine | Yale School of Medicine

Clinical Medical laboratories are an example of applied science, as opposed to research laboratories that focus on basic science, such as found in some academic institutions. PHYSICIAN & HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS PHYSICAL EXAM GUIDELINES Ethics Manuals, Guidelines, Publications, Technical Reports.

ETHICS MANUAL - Center for Ethics & Professionalism, American College of Physicians Multimedia Ethics Manual (Text & Images).

Examples of "Ethics Manual" Categories & Subcategories include. Clinical Chemistry Testing. View the chemistry group test page for detailed reports on certain tests and to obtain more information about the individual components of each test, click on the test name below.

For those tests that do not have links, most of the information can be gleaned from the other panels which include the same tests.

An analysis of the clinical chemistry test in medicine
Clinical chemistry - Wikipedia